Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Valheim than Celeron G3930 - 213 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $98.02 vs $202.98
- Up to 46% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-11700F - $0.51 vs $0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
213
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
53.68421052631579%
Price, $
$202.98
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $202.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360997 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
191
89.67136150234741%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360996 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
28.938600666349355%
Multi-Core
1043
11.86575654152446%
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |