Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 20% better in Valheim than Celeron G3930 - 229 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $98.02 vs $373.59
- Up to 69% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-13700K - $0.51 vs $1.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
31.28834355828221%
Price, $
$373.59
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $373.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349043 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
191
83.4061135371179%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349043 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
21.408450704225352%
Multi-Core
1043
5.922434841860201%
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |