Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2700K is 769 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1820 - 682 vs 674 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - $46.41 vs $82.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-2700K - $0.07 vs $0.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 53 vs 95 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
682
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
58.333333333333336%
Price, $
$82
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361654 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
674
98.82697947214076%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361654 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
73.94578313253012%
Multi-Core
825
36.43992932862191%
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |