Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $75.0 vs $198.9
- Up to 58% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600K - $0.39 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 11% better in Valheim than Core i7-3770S - 214 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 12 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
192
89.7196261682243%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348905 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
41.935483870967744%
Price, $
$198.9
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348905 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
30.60384263494968%
Multi-Core
2234
26.040331040913863%
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |