Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1327 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3970X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3970X - 127 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-3970X - $94.05 vs $209.74
- Up to 58% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3970X - $0.74 vs $1.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i7-3970X - 140 vs 150 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
FPS
118
92.91338582677166%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
41.57303370786517%
Price, $
$209.74
44%
Buy for $209.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360517 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360519 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
Single-Core
648
54.91525423728814%
Multi-Core
3305
60.31021897810219%
Intel Core i7-3970X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |