Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6900K is 436 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 183 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $145.0 vs $788.88
- Up to 82% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.79 vs $4.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349038 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
181
98.90710382513662%
Value, $/FPS
$4.36/FPS
18.11926605504587%
Price, $
$788.88
18%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
93.53035143769968%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |