Buy on Amazon
$167
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 and the cheaper Celeron G3930 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 10% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G3930 - 218 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - $98.02 vs $167.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i7-7700 - $0.49 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
218
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
63.63636363636363%
Price, $
$167
58%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-7700 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.2 GHz LGA 1151 100/200 Series 65W
Buy for $167 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350028 minutes ago
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
91.28440366972477%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350027 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
43.772498200143986%
Multi-Core
1043
23.385650224215247%
Intel Core i7-7700 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
