Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-920 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-920 is 1436 days older than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 12% cheaper than FX-8320 - $90.0 vs $102.02
- Up to 11% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8320 - $0.54 vs $0.61 per FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358130 minutes ago
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Bloomfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |