Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600 is 1006 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-6600 - $50.0 vs $74.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-6600 - $0.32 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G4900 - 165 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
156
94.54545454545455%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349408 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
71.11111111111111%
Price, $
$74
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349409 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
47.900466562986004%
Multi-Core
1051
29.588963963963966%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |