Buy on Amazon
$50
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $184
Availability
MSRP in USD: $184
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2132 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-3470 - $50.0 vs $69.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-3470 - $0.34 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 54 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349387 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-3470 Quad-Core Processor 3.2 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I53470
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349387 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
99.03536977491962%
Multi-Core
1051
57.1195652173913%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
