Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 40% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6350 - 198 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $100.0 vs $283.35
- Up to 50% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.71 vs $1.43 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
49.65034965034965%
Price, $
$283.35
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348438 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
141
71.21212121212122%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348437 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |