Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1410 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 179 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $94.05 vs $283.35
- Up to 65% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-10900KF - $0.55 vs $1.58 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
34.810126582278485%
Price, $
$283.35
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348434 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
171
95.53072625698324%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348435 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
66.93136698808848%
Multi-Core
5480
59.86454009176316%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |