Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 195 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $80.0 vs $283.35
- Up to 70% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.44 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
30.344827586206897%
Price, $
$283.35
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348552 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
180
92.3076923076923%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348552 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
59.67101531480431%
Multi-Core
3013
32.914572864321606%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |