Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2552 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 14% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8320 - 134 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $102.02 vs $615.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10900X - $0.86 vs $4.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.59/FPS
18.736383442265794%
Price, $
$615
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349756 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
118
88.05970149253731%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349756 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |