Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2430 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 26% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G3250 - 194 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $61.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900F - $0.4 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
32.25806451612904%
Price, $
$240
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361829 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
154
79.38144329896907%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361829 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
576
26.531552280055276%
Multi-Core
981
10.69676153091266%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |