Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1500X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 1500X - 194 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1500X - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $71.75 vs $240.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900F - $0.43 vs $1.24 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
34.677419354838705%
Price, $
$240
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361829 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
167
86.08247422680412%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$71.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $71.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361829 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1104
50.85214187010594%
Multi-Core
3644
39.73394395376731%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1500X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |