Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 108% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than FX-8120 - 137 vs 66 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $78.02 vs $265.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i9-11900K - $1.18 vs $1.93 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.93/FPS
61.13989637305699%
Price, $
$265
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361893 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
66
48.175182481751825%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361892 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |