Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1874 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 163 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $531.86 vs $788.88
- Up to 48% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $3.26 vs $6.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$531.86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $531.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351235 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
127
77.91411042944786%
Value, $/FPS
$6.21/FPS
52.49597423510467%
Price, $
$788.88
67%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
39.38782374705684%
Multi-Core
7539
37.505596736480776%
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |