Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 840 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 31% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3930 - 191 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $98.02 vs $372.84
- Up to 66% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-9900 - $0.67 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
34.35897435897436%
Price, $
$372.84
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $372.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349335 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
146
76.43979057591623%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349334 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
37.7405338299193%
Multi-Core
1043
14.478067740144365%
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |