Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $128.04 vs $299.95
- Up to 54% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-10600 - $1.01 vs $2.19 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6300 - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
127
92.7007299270073%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348608 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
46.11872146118722%
Price, $
$299.95
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348609 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |