Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 932 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $94.05 vs $359.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-9900KF - $0.79 vs $2.87 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.87/FPS
27.526132404181187%
Price, $
$359
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
119
95.19999999999999%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
69.7811945594323%
Multi-Core
5480
68.0491742207873%
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |