Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1968 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $64.03 vs $195.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen 7 1700 - $0.1 vs $0.28 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than FX-8150 - 697 vs 672 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
672
96.4131994261119%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361535 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
697
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
35.714285714285715%
Price, $
$195
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361536 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |