Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $64.03 vs $240.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-11900F - $0.13 vs $0.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Tanks than FX-8150 - 560 vs 504 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361684 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
560
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
30.232558139534888%
Price, $
$240
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361685 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |