Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3827 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - $64.03 vs $169.21
- Up to 54% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 7 5700X - $0.27 vs $0.59 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 23% better in Ready or Not than FX-8150 - 286 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
233
81.46853146853147%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361398 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
286
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
45.76271186440678%
Price, $
$169.21
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $169.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361398 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |