Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700 is 3735 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700 - $102.02 vs $272.69
- Up to 56% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 7 7700 - $0.8 vs $1.83 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700
- Performs up to 17% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8320 - 149 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
127
85.23489932885906%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
43.71584699453552%
Price, $
$272.69
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $272.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |