Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $102.02 vs $265.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-11900K - $0.78 vs $1.09 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 87% better in War Thunder than FX-8320 - 243 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
130
53.49794238683128%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349099 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
243
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
71.55963302752293%
Price, $
$265
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |