Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $102.02 vs $283.35
- Up to 59% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900KF - $0.92 vs $2.27 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than FX-8320 - 125 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 20 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349091 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
40.528634361233486%
Price, $
$283.35
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349091 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |