Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-2600K outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-2600K is 653 days older than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than FX-8320 - 165 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than FX-8320 - $70.0 vs $102.02
- Up to 33% better value when playing God of War than FX-8320 - $0.42 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
163
98.7878787878788%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
66.66666666666666%
Price, $
$102.02
68%
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360852 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360851 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |