Buy on Amazon
$185
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $229
Availability
MSRP in USD: $229
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2004 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 5% better in Rocket League than FX-8350 - 708 vs 674 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than FX-8350 - $99.97 vs $185.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Rocket League than FX-8350 - $0.14 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
674
95.19774011299435%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
51.85185185185185%
Price, $
$185
54%
AMD FD8350FRHKWOX FX-8350 Octa-core (8 Core) 4 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4.20 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 125 W (AMDFD8350FRHKWOX)
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361058 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
708
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X CPU Used 6-Core 12-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 16M 95W Socket AM4
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361059 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
