Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2135 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 38% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $276.99 vs $450.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $2.54 vs $3.33 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 24% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8370 - 135 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 24 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
109
80.74074074074075%
Value, $/FPS
$2.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$276.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359683 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.33/FPS
76.27627627627628%
Price, $
$450
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359684 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |