Buy on Amazon
$39.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - $39.95 vs $110.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-7400 - $0.36 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-7400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3900 - 119 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
112
94.11764705882352%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349335 minutes ago
Core i5-7400
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
39.13043478260869%
Price, $
$110
36%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5 i5-7400 Quad-core (4 Core) 3 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack (D132)
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5-7400
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
49.404761904761905%
Multi-Core
992
30.693069306930692%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
