Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 293 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 58% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $39.95 vs $94.05
- Up to 56% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.31 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G3900 - 133 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
128
96.2406015037594%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349335 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
43.66197183098592%
Price, $
$94.05
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |