Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $39.95 vs $133.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-10600KF - $0.31 vs $0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G3900 - 138 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
128
92.7536231884058%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349342 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
32.29166666666667%
Price, $
$133
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $133 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
34.46026097271649%
Multi-Core
992
14.547587622818595%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |