Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 897 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G3250 - 120 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Pentium G3250 - 51 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 38% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $61.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 38% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - $0.51 vs $0.82 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
62.19512195121951%
Price, $
$98.02
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349765 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
119
99.16666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349765 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
576
94.73684210526315%
Multi-Core
981
94.0556088207095%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |