Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4670S outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4670S is 1311 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670S - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - 128 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $55.26 vs $98.02
- Up to 48% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - $0.43 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
93.75%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
52.4390243902439%
Price, $
$98.02
56%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349879 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349880 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
52.82363162467419%
Multi-Core
1043
32.052858020897354%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |