Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2365 days newer than the more expensive FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than FX-8120 - 161 vs 153 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than FX-8120 - $50.0 vs $78.02
- Up to 39% better value when playing Rust than FX-8120 - $0.31 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349516 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
153
95.03105590062113%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
60.78431372549019%
Price, $
$78.02
64%
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349517 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |