Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3129 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-750 - 156 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-750 - $50.0 vs $75.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-750 - $0.32 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
156
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349405 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
154
98.71794871794873%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
65.3061224489796%
Price, $
$75
66%
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |