Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770S is 2165 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-3770S - $50.0 vs $75.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-3770S - $0.18 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770S - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G4900 - 278 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
276
99.28057553956835%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349400 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
278
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
66.66666666666666%
Price, $
$75
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
92.07772795216741%
Multi-Core
1051
47.04565801253357%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |