Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 455 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $50.0 vs $66.82
- Up to 22% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-7100T - $0.18 vs $0.23 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 4% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G4900 - 287 vs 276 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
276
96.16724738675958%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349513 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
287
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
78.26086956521738%
Price, $
$66.82
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349515 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
55.19713261648745%
Multi-Core
1051
46.50442477876106%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |