Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 455 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $50.0 vs $63.5
- Up to 18% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-7400T - $0.32 vs $0.39 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G4900 - 162 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
156
96.29629629629629%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349405 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
82.05128205128204%
Price, $
$63.5
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349406 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
60.570304818092424%
Multi-Core
1051
37.45545260156807%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |