Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 327 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8150 - 275 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $64.03 vs $79.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-3220 - $0.23 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
79.31034482758622%
Price, $
$79
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349763 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
273
99.27272727272727%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349764 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |