Buy on Amazon
$82.8
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 232 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1820 - 104 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-4370 - $46.41 vs $82.8
- Up to 36% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-4370 - $0.51 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-4370 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
104
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
63.74999999999999%
Price, $
$82.8
56%
FPS Winner
Intel BX80646I34370 Core i3-4370 Haswell Dual-Core 3.8GHz LGA 1150 54W Desktop Processor
Buy for $82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350012 minutes ago
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
91
87.5%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Intel CPU BX80646G1820 Celeron G1820 2.70GHz 2M LGA1150 2C/2T Haswell
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350011 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
40.24590163934426%
Multi-Core
825
34.27503115911924%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
