Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 18% better in Rust than Celeron G3900 - 188 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - $39.95 vs $70.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-7100 - $0.25 vs $0.37 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
67.56756756756756%
Price, $
$70
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349636 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
84.57446808510637%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349635 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
46.59182036888532%
Multi-Core
992
40.65573770491803%
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |