Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1696 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in HITMAN 3 than Core i5-2400S - 189 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-2400S - $39.95 vs $70.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i5-2400S - $0.21 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 51 vs 65 Watts
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
188
99.47089947089947%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
56.75675675675676%
Price, $
$70
57%
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350036 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350036 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |