Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2405S outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2405S is 143 days older than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than FX-8150 - 45 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than FX-8150 - $46.0 vs $64.03
- Up to 32% better value when playing Starfield than FX-8150 - $1.02 vs $1.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
45
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349958 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
43
95.55555555555556%
Value, $/FPS
$1.49/FPS
68.45637583892618%
Price, $
$64.03
71%
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349958 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2405S | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |