Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 1057 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 2% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G1820 - 126 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $46.41 vs $390.81
- Up to 88% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-2500K - $0.38 vs $3.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 53 vs 95 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.1/FPS
12.258064516129032%
Price, $
$390.81
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $390.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349400 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
123
97.61904761904762%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349401 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |