Buy on Amazon
$75
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2184 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 24% better in League of Legends than Core i5-750 - 67 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-750 - $39.95 vs $75.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i5-750 - $0.6 vs $1.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
54
80.59701492537313%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
43.16546762589928%
Price, $
$75
53%
Intel Core i5-750 Quad-Core Desktop Processor (BX80605I5750) 8M Cache, 2.66 GHz, LGA1156
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361749 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
67
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361749 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-750 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
