Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3266 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G840.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield 2042 than Pentium G840 - 166 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G840
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $45.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-10700F - $0.31 vs $1.36 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
22.794117647058822%
Price, $
$225.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361875 minutes ago
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
143
86.14457831325302%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361875 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Single-Core
439
27.233250620347395%
Multi-Core
745
10.302862674595492%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Pentium G840 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |