Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 2996 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 21% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-3210 - 285 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $70.0 vs $202.98
- Up to 58% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-11700F - $0.3 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
285
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
42.25352112676056%
Price, $
$202.98
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $202.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361152 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
236
82.80701754385966%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
24.226558781532603%
Multi-Core
1018
11.581342434584755%
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |