Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 1246 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 13% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3210 - 172 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $70.0 vs $651.07
- Up to 88% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6950X - $0.46 vs $3.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.79/FPS
12.137203166226913%
Price, $
$651.07
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 363252 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
152
88.37209302325581%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 363251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |